🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response from the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any use of the assets as theft. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."